Why Xiaomi and iPhone X cameras are compared – and is it worth it?
The iPhone X camera (2017) is still considered the benchmark for the balance between hardware and software processing: dual module 12 MP with optics f/1.8 and f/2.4, optical stabilization, portrait mode with bokeh effect — these chips made it legendary. But progress is not standing still: modern Xiaomi smartphones for the same money (or cheaper) offer high resolution, large matrices and advanced processing algorithms that in some respects overtake the Apple flagship 6 years ago.
In this article, we will analyze which Xiaomi, Redmi and other models are used. POCO into 2026 The iPhone X can compete with the iPhone X in terms of photo and video quality, taking into account daytime shooting, portrait mode, night shots and stabilization. Compare not only the "dry" characteristics, but also real-life examples of images, as well as prices (spoiler: the difference can reach a significant amount of time). 3-4 once!).
⚠️ Note: If you expect 100% identical quality, it doesn’t exist. Apple and Xiaomi use different processing approaches: the former rely on natural colors and smooth transitions, the latter on high detail and contrast. We are looking for models that are as close as possible to the final result, and do not copy the "Apple" style.
Key Camera Settings for iPhone X – What to Overcome?
To objectively compare smartphones, let’s analyze what exactly the iPhone X camera is valued for:
- 📸 Double module 12 MP (wide-angle) + telephoto) with optical stabilization on the main lens.
- 🌙 Night mode (though not as advanced as the new iPhones) with good shadow work.
- 👤 Portrait mode with accurate background blur and lighting support (effects "Studio", "Contour" and others.).
- 🎥 Video 4K@60fps with smooth stabilization and good color reproduction.
- 🔍 7 MP front camera with portrait mode and Animoji support.
Now let’s see which Xiaomi smartphones from 2023-2026 can offer similar or better specs – and where they are losing out.
TOP-5 Xiaomi smartphones with a camera at the level of iPhone X
We have selected models that are not inferior (or superior) to the iPhone X in key terms, but are significantly cheaper. In the table below, a brief comparison, and then we will discuss each model in detail.
| Model | Main camera. | Telephoto/Ultrashirk | Night mode. | Video | Price (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi 14 | 50 MP, f/1.6, OIS | 50 MP (telephoto, 3.2x) + 50 MP (ultrashirk) | Yeah, with. AI-improvement | 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps | 65,000 ₽ |
| Redmi Note 13 Pro+ | 200 MP, f/1.67, OIS | 8 MP (ultrashiro) + 2 MP (macro) | Yeah, manually controlled. | 4K@30fps | 35,000 ₽ |
| POCO F6 Pro | 50 MP, f/1.6, OIS | 8 MP (ultrashiro) + 2 MP (macro) | Yeah, with the night video. | 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps | 40,000 ₽ |
| Xiaomi 13T | 50 MP, f/1.9, OIS | 50 MP (telephoto, 2x) + 12 MP (ultrashirk) | Yeah, with Leica profiles. | 4K@60fps | 50. ₽ |
| Redmi K70 Pro | 50 MP, f/1.6, OIS | 12 MP (ultrashir) + 50 MP (telephoto, 2x) | Yeah, with. AI-denoise | 8K@24fps | 45,000 ₽ |
🔍 Bottom Line: All of these models outperform the iPhone X in the resolution of the main camera and support optical stabilization. However, for a full comparison, you need to consider the software processing, which often determines the final quality of images.
Comparison photo: Xiaomi vs iPhone X on real examples
Technical specifications are good, but how do models perform in practice? We analyzed the images from reviews and tests (sources: DxOMark, GSMArena, NotebookCheck) and highlighted key observations.
🌞 Daytime shooting
The iPhone X is famous for its natural color reproduction and smooth transitions between shades. Xiaomi 14 and Xiaomi 13T (with Leica profiles) are close to this style, but add more detail in the shadows. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ with a 200-MP sensor gives record detail, but sometimes overdoses with saturation.
🌙 Night shooting
Here the iPhone X loses to modern Xiaomi: the night mode in the POCO F6 Pro and Redmi K70 Pro copes with noise better, and Xiaomi 14 generally supports night video shooting (which is not the “Apple” competitor).
👤 Portrait mode
The reference bokeh effect of the iPhone X is difficult to repeat, but the Xiaomi 13T with Leica optics is as close as possible - especially in the development of the edges of objects. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ sometimes mistaken with hair blur, but offers more creative effects.
📌 Example: In the photos with Xiaomi 14 in portrait mode, the skin textures are better worked out, but the iPhone X more accurately separates the object from the background on complex scenes (for example, with hair loose).
Detailed tests of Xiaomi cameras vs iPhone X
Video: Where is Xiaomi overtaking the iPhone X?
If the iPhone X still can compete with the budget Xiaomi, then in the video the gap is obvious.
- 🎬 Permission 8K (iPhone X is the maximum 4K).
- 📐 Wide dynamic range (HDR10+ Xiaomi 14 vs. HDR iPhone).
- 🤖 AI-stabilization (b) POCO F6 Pro uses a hybrid algorithm that combines OIS and EIS).
- 🎤 High-quality sound: stereo recording with noise reduction (in the iPhone X mono-microphone).
🔴 Xiaomi: In cheap models (for example, Redmi Note) 13 Pro+) photograph 4K@30fps overheating 10-15 minutes of continuous recording. Flagships (Xiaomi) 14, 13T) lacking in this.
⚠️ Note: If you are critical to high-quality video for professional tasks (for example, shooting for YouTube), pay attention to the codecs. iPhone X writes in the video. H.264, Xiaomi 14 supports the H.265 (Best compression at the same quality, but not all editors handle it correctly.
🔹 Support 4K@60fps (Not all models are available)
🔹 Presence OIS (optical stabilization)
🔹 Maximum recording duration without overheating
🔹 Codec formats (H.264 vs H.265)
🔹 Quality of microphones (stereo vs mono)
-->
Front camera: self-selling like the iPhone X
The iPhone X frontal (7MP, f/2.2) is still considered one of the best selfie experiences thanks to its precise face processing and natural background blur.
- 🤳 Xiaomi 14: 32 MPP, f/2.0, Autofocus, portrait mode with lighting effects.
- 🤳 POCO F6 Pro: 16 MPP, f/2.45, night-time.
- 🤳 Redmi K70 Pro: 16 MPP, f/2.0, video 1080p@60fps.
The critical difference: only Xiaomi 14 and Xiaomi 13T support autofocus on the front camera – this is fundamental for clear selfies from close range (for example, for storis).
📌 Tip: If you care about selfies, avoid fixed-focus models (like the Redmi Note 13 Pro).+). Blurring background in them is implemented programmatically and often looks unnatural.
The price of the question: how much does the camera cost like the iPhone X?
One of Xiaomi’s biggest advantages is its price/quality ratio, and let’s see how much you’ll have to pay for a similar (or better) camera quality:
- 💰 iPhone X (b/y 2026): 30,000 to 40,000 ₽.
- 💰 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (new): from 35,000 ₽ (Winnings in resolution and night mode).
- 💰 POCO F6 Pro (new): from 40,000 ₽ (8K-video OIS).
- 💰 Xiaomi 13T (new): from 50,000 ₽ (Leica optics and telephoto).
- 💰 Xiaomi 14 (new): from 65,000 ₽ (flagship level, but more expensive than the iPhone X).
💡 Conclusion: For the same 30,000-40,000 ₽, What you ask for used iPhone X, you can buy a new Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or POCO F6 Pro with objectively better camera (by resolution, night mode and video) Xiaomi flagships (13T, 14) will cost more, but will offer professional chips like manual settings and shooting in the RAW.
💡
If the budget is limited to 30,000-40,000 ₽, The best choice is the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or POCO F6 They outperform the iPhone X in most camera settings, except portrait mode (where Apple is still ahead).