Why compare Redmond and Xiaomi?
Choosing a robot vacuum cleaner is not an easy task: the market is flooded with models with similar characteristics but radically different prices. Redmond and Xiaomi are the two brands that most often make the shortlist of customers. The first is associated with reliability and adaptation to the Russian market, the second with innovation and the smart home ecosystem. But who is really better at cleaning?
This article is not about abstract pros and cons, but about specific technical differences that affect the outcome, and we'll look at 8 criteria, from suction power to integration with voice assistants, and we'll give you a checklist for your use case. Spoiler: pet owners may find the best choice unexpectedly.
1. Suction power: who is stronger?
Suction power is a key parameter that determines whether a robot can handle carpets, wool or construction dust. Xiaomiβs flagship models (such as the Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Pro) offer up to 4,000 Pa, while Redmondβs maximum is 2,700 Pa (Redmond RV-R350), a difference of 1,300 Pa that is noticeable when cleaning thick carpets or long pile.
But power isn't always synonymous with quality. For example, the Redmond RV-R300 with 2200 Pa is better at collecting dust in the corners thanks to a V-shaped brush, while some Xiaomi models lose efficiency at the junctions of the boards. It's important to consider the type of engine: Xiaomi often uses brushless motors (longer lasts), Redmond - classic.
- π Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Pro: 4000 Pa, brushless engine
- π Redmond RV-R350: 2700 Pa, classic engine with improved cooling
- β‘ Redmond RV-R300: 2200 Pa, but better collects dust in the corners
Navigation and mapping: who won't get lost?
The navigation system determines how quickly and accurately the robot will walk through the room. Xiaomi uses laser rangefinders (LDS) in top-end models that build an accurate map of the room in 1-2 passes. Redmond is in most cases limited to gyroscopes + optical sensors, which is less accurate, but cheaper to repair.
The difference is noticeable in larger apartments: Xiaomi with LDS bypasses the room along the optimal route (for example, a snake along the walls), while Redmond can randomly rush, skipping plots. However, for studios or one-bedroom apartments, the difference is not critical β both brands cope well.
| Model | Type of navigation | Map accuracy | Possibility of zoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Pro | LDS (laser) | High (accurrence Β± 5 cm) | Yes (up to 10 zones) |
| Redmond RV-R350 | Gyroscope + optical sensors | Mean (accuracy Β± 15 cm) | Yes (up to 5 zones) |
| Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop P | VSLAM (camera) | High (but dependent on lighting) | Yes (up to 8 zones) |
β οΈ Attention: Robots with LDS-navigation (e.g. Xiaomi) may not work well in rooms with mirrored surfaces or black floors β the laser is reflected or absorbed, which knocks the map down.
3.Wool and hair cleaning: Pet test
If you have pets in your house, the number one criterion is how the robot handles the hair, and here Redmond suddenly jumps forward: the RV-R300 and RV-R350 are equipped with rubber rollers that do not wind hair (unlike Xiaomi brush rollers), which means that the robot will have to clean less often, once in 3-5 cleanings instead of each.
Xiaomi compensates for this with power: for example, the Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Pro sucks the wool so hard that it hardly stays on the roller, but if the hair is long (like Persian cats), it still winds up, the solution is to buy models with a self-cleaning station (for example, Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X10+), but this is a completely different budget.
Is there a rubber roller (not winding the wool)|
Suction power β₯ 2500 Pa|
Availability of wet cleaning function (for dried spots)|
Easy cleaning of the container (better - removable without tools)-->
Critical detail: Redmond robots with rubber rollers require replacement every 6-12 months (cost ~1,500 rubles), while Xiaomi brush rollers last longer (18-24 months), but need weekly cleaning.
4. Wet cleaning: who is better at washing?
Most robot vacuum cleaners can clean floors, but the quality varies greatly. Xiaomi in models with a moping function (Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Pro, DreameBot D9) uses electronic water control, which means that the humidity of the floor is regulated automatically. Redmond (RV-R350) water is supplied mechanically, which can lead to divorces on the laminate.
Key differences:
- π§ Xiaomi: 3 levels of intensity of moping, you can set areas without cleaning (for example, carpets).
- π§ Redmond: only 1 wet cleaning mode, but the water capacity is 200 ml (vs. 180 ml in Xiaomi).
- π§Ό Both brands require special detergents - ordinary water leaves divorces.
β οΈ Attention: Robots with moping function do not replace manual cleaning! They only cope with mild contamination.
5.Smart Functions and Integrations
If you use a smart home, the choice between brands becomes obvious: Xiaomi is fully integrated into the Mi Home ecosystem, supports voice assistants (Alice, Google Assistant, Siri) and allows you to customize complex scenarios, such as running a cleanup by geolocation (when you leave the house) or by schedule with a weather-related reference.
Redmond offers only basic integration through Ready for Sky and supports Alice, but the brand has a unique feature β scheduled cleaning with electricity rates (relevant for regions with multi-tariff meters).
How to set up a geo-fence for Xiaomi?
Another plus of Xiaomi is firmware updates, the brand regularly adds new features (for example, object recognition in the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X10+), while Redmond releases updates less often.
Noise level and operating time
Noise is a critical parameter if you plan to run a robot at night or while you're working, and here Redmond wins: most models run at 55-60 dB (comparable to conversation), while Xiaomi delivers 65-70 dB (like a vacuum cleaner) at maximum power, the difference is especially noticeable in small apartments.
In terms of operating time, both brands are approximately equal:
- β³ Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Pro: up to 120 minutes (at minimum power).
- β³ Redmond RV-R350: up to 150 minutes, but with less suction power.
- π Both robots automatically return to base to recharge and continue cleaning.
π‘
To reduce Xiaomi noise, install the βSilent Cleaningβ mode in the application (suction power will decrease to 1500-1800 Pa, but the noise will fall to 58-60 dB).
7.Price and cost of ownership
At the initial price, Redmond is cheaper: flagship models cost 20β30 thousand rubles, while similar Xiaomi β 30β50 thousand rubles.
| Item of expenditure | Redmond RV-R350 | Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| The cost of a robot | 25,000 rubles. | 35,000 rubles. |
| Replacement of roller (once in 6-12 months.) | 1,500 rubles (rubber) | 800 rubles (brush) |
| HEPA filters (once every 3-6 months) | 600 rubles (2 units) | 500 rubles (2 units) |
| Side brushes (once in 3 months.) | 400 rubles. | 300 rubles. |
| Cleaning agent (for 6 months) | 300 rubles. | 400 rubles. |
As you can see from the table, Xiaomi is cheaper to maintain, but the initial price is higher. Redmond is more profitable if you do not plan to use the robot more often 2-3 times a week.
π‘
With intensive operation (daily cleaning), Xiaomi pays off in 1.5-2 years due to lower cost of consumables and greater engine reliability.
8 Reliability and service support
Xiaomi is the leader in reliability: brushless motors and laser rangefinders break less often than mechanical parts of Redmond. However, the second brand has an important advantage β a developed service network in Russia. parts for Redmond are easier to find and repair is cheaper (for example, replacing the engine β ~ 3000 rubles. versus ~ 5000 rubles. at Xiaomi).
Both brands have a warranty period of 12 months, but Xiaomi often offers an extended warranty of up to 24 months when buying from branded stores.An important caveat: if you buy Xiaomi through unofficial sellers (for example, on AliExpress), the warranty may not work in Russia.
β οΈ Note: Xiaomi robots with LDS-If the device falls from a height of more than 50 cm (for example, from a table), the laser rangefinder can fail".