Choosing between Xiaomi and Kivi TVs is not just a matter of preference, but a balanced decision that depends on your priorities: whether it’s image quality for moviephiles, powerful sound for music evenings, or smart features for integration into the gadget ecosystem. Both brands offer models in the same price segment (from budget to premium), but their approaches to technology and assembly are fundamentally different.
In this article, we’ll look at 7 key aspects, from matrices and processors to branded Smart TV chips and service, and learn why the Xiaomi Mi TV Q2 beats the Kivi 55U750 in brightness but loses in sound, how brand origins affect the price of parts, and which models to look at in 2026. And at the end, you’ll find a comparison table and answers to frequent questions — for example, why Kivi has more Wi-Fi problems, and how to fix it.
Spoiler: If you want a TV for PS5 or Xbox Series X games, Xiaomi should be given priority because of HDMI 2.1 and 120Hz support. But for a budget-constrained kitchen or bedroom, Kivi will offer better options.
Image quality: matrices, brightness and technology
The main difference between brands lies in the approach to matrices. Xiaomi is actively using the VA-quantum-dot panels (QLED) in premium segment models (e.g. Mi) TV Q2 75), which provides black depth and high contrast, while Kivi is more likely to be put on. IPS-panels even in the middle segment (e.g. Kivi) 50U780), Those who lose in contrast but win in viewing angles.
Xiaomi is the leader in brightness: their flagship models reach 400-500 nits against 250-350 nits from Kivi. HDR-For example, in the Mi tests. TV A2 55′′ showed 30% better detail in dark scenes compared to Kivi 55U750 Thanks to Dolby Vision Technology.
- 🔹 Xiaomi: VA/QLED, High brightness, deep black, but narrow viewing angles.
- 🔹 Kivi: IPS, wide viewing angles, but less contrast and brightness.
- 🔹 Exception: Kivi 65Q750 — One of the few brands with VA-matrix.
⚠️ WARNING: If you plan to hang the TV on the wall at an angle to the sofa, IPS-Kivi panel will be preferred – the picture will not “fad” when viewed from the side.
2.Sound: embedded speakers vs external systems
Here Kivi is traditionally stronger. Their TVs are equipped with speakers with a capacity of 20-24 watts (for example, Kivi 50U780 has a system 2.1 with a subwoofer), whereas Xiaomi even in the top models rarely found more than 16-18 watts. The difference is especially noticeable at low frequencies: bass Kivi sound richer without distortion.
However, if you use an external sound system (soundbar or home theater), the Kivi advantage is offset, and Xiaomi offers better integration with its soundbars (such as Mi Soundbar 3.1ch) via Mi Home, where the sound automatically adjusts to the stage.
| Parameter | Xiaomi Mi TV Q2 55" | Kivi 55U780 |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic power | 16 W (2.0) | 24 W (2.1) |
| Sound technology | Dolby Audio, DTS-HD | Dolby Digital Plus, Virtual Surround |
| Support for external systems | Yes (via HDMI ARC and Mi Home) | Yes (HDMI ARC only) |
3. Smart TV: Android vs Own Shell
Xiaomi is in the lead here, with all of their TVs running Android TV (or Google TV in new models), giving Google Play access with thousands of apps, Google Assistant, and integration with other Xiaomi devices (such as smart lights or a robot vacuum cleaner).
Kivi uses its own Linux-based shell, which looks simpler and runs faster on weak hardware but is severely limited in functionality. For example, Kivi does not have official support for Netflix in 4K (you have to install workarounds), and the app store contains only a few dozen items.
- 📺 Xiaomi: Android TV/Google TV, Google Play, Chromecast, Mi Home.
- 📺 Kivi: Own shell on Linux, limited app store.
- 🔄 Updates: Xiaomi releases firmware every 2-3 months, Kivi – every six months.
💡
If you need YouTube in 4K on a Kivi TV, install the app through the alternative Aptoide TV store (instructions in FAQ).
4.Performance: Processors and Ping in Games
For gamers and fans of streaming in 4K Xiaomi uses MediaTek chips (for example, the processor is critical, MT9611 mi TV Q1) Amlogic (in budget models) that provide a smooth interface and low input lag (~The Kivi is often spared on hardware: even in models for 50 000 ₽ You can find outdated Realtek. RTD2863, slow-motion.
If you’re connecting to a PS5 or Xbox, look out for HDMI 2.1 and VRR (variable refresh rate) support, which is only available to Xiaomi in the Q2 and S Pro models. Kivi even has flagships limited to HDMI 2.0, which means a maximum of 4K@60Hz without HDR in games.
HDMI 2.1 | VRR and ALLM|Input lag support no more than 15 ms|Availability of game mode in the settings-->
5. Design and Assembly: Plastic vs Metal
Xiaomi is betting on a minimalist design with thin bezels (like the Mi TV S Pro has a frame of just 2mm) and metal legs.The body is usually plastic but with a matte texture that doesn't collect fingerprints.The Kivi, by contrast, often uses glossy plastic that looks cheaper and gets dirty faster.
Both brands are roughly on the same level in terms of build reliability, but there is a caveat: Kivi is more likely to have problems with Wi-Fi modules (especially in the 2022 models), which is due to savings on antennas. If stable wireless signal is critical (for example, for IPTV), choose Xiaomi or connect via cable.
⚠️ Note: In the Kivi TV series U7xx 2021-2022 was a defect in the attachment of the matrix, which over time could appear "moir" effects. Q3).
Price and price-quality ratio
In the budget segment (20 000-35,000) ₽) Kivi often offers a larger diagonal for the same money. 50U780 You can find cheaper Xiaomi Mi TV A2 43" with similar characteristics, but in the premium segment (60,000) ₽+) Xiaomi wins with advanced technology (QLED, 120 Hz, HDMI 2.1).
The cost of ownership is different: Xiaomi parts (such as matrixes or power supplies) are cheaper and more affordable because the brand is more popular, while Kivi service centers are not available in all cities, which can complicate repairs.
| Model | Price (2026) | Diagonal | Main advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi Mi TV A2 43" | ~28 000 ₽ | 43" | Android TV, low input lag |
| Kivi 50U780 | ~32 000 ₽ | 50" | A large diagonal for less money |
| Xiaomi Mi TV Q2 55" | ~55 000 ₽ | 55" | QLED, 120Hz, HDMI 2.1 |
💡
If you have a budget but you need a big diagonal, go with Kivi. If you want technology and durability, go with Xiaomi.
7. Service and warranty: what to do in case of breakdown?
The warranty period for both brands is standard – 12 months, but there are differences in service:
- 🔧 Xiaomi: More advanced service center network (including partner workshops), fast spare parts delivery, average repair time of 7-14 days.
- 🔧 Kivi: Fewer official centers, parts sometimes have to wait up to 3-4 weeks. In small towns, repairs can only be carried out through courier delivery to Moscow or St. Petersburg.
Important point: Xiaomi is more likely to meet customers in warranty cases (for example, replaces the TV in factory defect matrix). Kivi is not uncommon cases when repairs are denied, citing “improper operation” (for example, when overheating due to poor ventilation).